Advice in form of poem - inspired by the Cecilia Sue scandal.

What happened to Cecilia's husband? After watching the whole incident, I came up with some advice for all you guys:

Whatever you do with your life,
Don't marry a pretty wife.
Men see her  with lustful glee.
You will suffer lots of insecurity.
You small salary and Nissan,
Cannot satisfy her material wants.

Men at the top will want her,
Using their money and power.
Late nights, mysterious calls, SMSes,
They woo her with sweet promises.
You'll soon be neglected like an old toy,
Left out cold useless working class boy.
She asks why I ever marry such a loser,
A lowly slowly promoted average worker.

If you ever want a happy life,
Make an ugly woman your wife.
She will make your meals delicious,
Clean your clothes and do the dishes.
You want a woman who is delighted,
To be with a husband that is dedicated.
Happy you support the family,
To take bus and live in H-D-B.
No worries when she's home alone.
No wierd strangers call her phone.
The kids - can be sure are your children,
Not someone elses production.

So friends this is my advice,
Want to get married think twice.
Look at her face carefully,
Make sure body not too sexy.
Remember when make love at night,
You can turn off all the lights.
In dark doesn't  matter how she looks,
So long as she can cook.

Feel so sorry for Mr. Sue,
Marriage too late for rescue.
Had he married a plain Jane,
Won't suffer so much pain.
Please remember his tregedy,
Wear Green hat for all to see.
Whole country knows his wife,
How can he carry on with life.

My advice to Mr. Sue today
Cut your losses and look away.
This type of woman just forget it.
She can lie and always cheat.
As your life falls apart,
Remember this is a new start.
Next time avoid all the misery,
Don't marry a woman so sexy.     

Ng Boon Gay case - DEFENSE STRIKES BACK!

Cecilia Sue breaks down in court, insists she is telling "the truth"

SINGAPORE - The woman at the centre of former Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) Director Ng Boon Gay's high profile corruption case was grilled on Thursday morning on whether she had an intimate relationship with Ng.

Ms Cecilia Sue, 36, was asked by Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng, Ng's lawyer, why she said she had sexual intercourse with Ng in her first statement to the Corrupt Practices Investiagtion Bureau (CPIB) in December last year.

Ms Sue replied she had done so in order "not to implicate anyone", and as she was frightened. The defence lawyer, however, probed the former Oracle sales manager on how she could be so detailed about the incident two years earlier.

The statement, paragraphs of which were submitted to the court by the defence,described an undressed Ng pushing aside Ms Sue's panties for sexual intercourse, followed by oral sex in an apartment at Great World City in June 2009.

It is also inconsistent, Mr Tan said, that she subsequently altered a sentence in the statement to read: "I had a (more) liking for Boon Gay", after the incident.

Disclaiming the factual veracity of the statement, and breaking down once during the intense cross-examination, Ms Sue said: "What I say today is the truth. Nothing but the truth."

Earlier in the morning, Mr Tan read out text messages Ms Sue had sent to Ng, 46, which suggested the two had an intimate relationship.

The first message read out in court was "Do you DIY?". Another message on July 2 last year read: "I could have three hours with you. We had fun". Yet another, later that same day said: "She's home?".

Among other messages Mr Tan read to the court: "M U", "you ignore me how how how"and in response to a text message that was not replied to: "where's family day?"

Ng is facing four charges of corruption for obtaining oral sex from Ms Sue in return for allegedly favouring tenders from the companies she worked for.

The Prosecution's case is that Ms Sue was pressured into performing fellatio because she was concerned about the contracts, and that she would jeopardise the commercial relationship she had built with the CNB.

The defence's case is that Ng had an affair with Ms Sue between 2009 and last year, but personal indiscretions aside, was not corrupt.

If convicted, Ng could be jailed up to five years and fined S$100,000 for each charge.

The trial has been adjourned and hearing will resume Friday morning.

National Conversation going downhill....

1. LHL propose 6 M population number.
2. Lim Hang Kiang say you want 1% growth or 3%...if there is no large influx growth will slow.
3. Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin warned that this sentiment (to think we can live with slower growth and lower influx) pre-supposes Singapore has arrived and that survival is not an issue.

What is Tan Chuan-Jin trying to say? Without foreigners to ramp up growth, Singapore cannot survive? Lets get it straight many Singaporeans are HARDLY surviving today under PAP policies fearing job loss to foreigners, low pay and rising cost of living.

We must look at things in totality and good back to basics. To import foreigners to survive is self contradictory...we are not surviving but on living on borrowed time, at some point as the numbers of foreigners grown, the concept of Singapore the nation becomes meaningless. Economies can grow or shrink ...nations can still survive, but you destroy a nations identity, it is gone forever. Our leaders don't understand this...that makes me worry for my country.     

Yes, Singaporeans are the most ungrateful people, here's proof!

We have scholar leaders who received the best education in the world free of charged using tax payers money...but when asked to serve in public office they refused to do so unless they are paid the highest salaries in the world. Is there pple any where else in the worl as ungrateful as these? Oh what sense of entitlement we have created among the ruling class. Not only have we created elitism and this belief of self-deserved entitlement mentality, this group perceive ordinary Singaporeans who need aid with disdain and often takes a condescending tone when they speak to the masses.

What abt rich employers who already earned their millions refusing to pay decent wages to workers and keep insisting on govt importing more cheap labor to boost their profits at the expense of ordinary workers. ..this very ungrateful act rightfully people see through employers like Douglas Foo. What about the rich that enjoy lowest taxes in the world and give the least to charity among all the rich in advanced country.. .look at Bill Gates and Warren Buffett both giving every cent of their wealth away believing it is not theirs to keep.. .yet our rich refuse to give back and the PAP give them the lowest tax rate in the world. ..breeding the selfish nature found in men.

Yes, Singapore is an ungrateful society.. .this ungratefulness polarises our society. ..it is disgusting for ordinary people to have to see all this ungratefulness among us starting with the men on top. It is shameful to see old and aged workers who contributed so much to our economy still working well beyond retirement age ...it is highly ungrateful for us to allow this. 

An ungrateful society is an unhappy society. We must all be grateful and show it otherwise prolong this miserable period of unhappiness among us.

A walk through my neighborhood....

As I walk out of my home out to the balcony, I pass by my neighbours homes but those old neighbours are gone. Their homes sold to foreigners who come to Singapore as PRs or rented to foreigners. The familiar sounds and surrounding I grew up in fading away to give way to foreign tongues, foreign accents and the smell of foreign foods.

As I make my way to the void deck, I see a large group of Filipinos and Indians gathered there.....oh where have all my Malay neighbours gone? They used to go down with their guitars to sing a tune or two. They used to play soccer with me at the open field - oh how I miss those days I played soccer on that field with my Malay, Indian and Eurasian friends. Now it is a picnic ground for Bangladeshi workers. Not that I have anything against them but how things have changed ...really wonder where all the Singaporean children have gone, nobody seems to play soccer anymore there.

Dropping by at the coffeeshop, where I have been going to since I was 3 years old. The old man selling mee pok is still there so is the aunty selling pork porridge. But the rest of the stalls are now run by people from China. I can still manage with the heavy accented Chinese but really wonder where all of the old Singaporean and Malaysians coffeeshop aunties = where have they gone? Occasionally, I see my friend Ah Teck coming round to sell tissue paper - he has been jobless for a long time because he has little qualifications and some problem with his leg. The world seems to have left people like him behind.

The coffee shop is an interesting place. A mini-institution in the neighborhood. Where old men past their prime gather to drink beer to revive their egos....I have a theory they do so because their old body and minds are fading away, the alcohol makes them feel liberated and these old men start talking about their old glory days or scold the PAP govt.....alcohol, the antidote for repressed political sentiment.

Not too far from the coffeeshop is my secondary school. You know there are 10 bands for secondary schools and there are schools so lowly ranked they are unbanded. Yes, this is one of the schools for "the others" where you are more likely to end up in a gang than go to university. Putting weak students in an bad environment that make them weaker academically is our govt's idea of inclusiveness. Yeah, when all the ministers sit a table, they will talk about which batch of RI, ACS or  RGS they come from. We wedge our society apart - the best gets the best, the worse gets the worse...producing humans of extremely separate polarity. Make the strong stronger, make the weak weaker.

The school is not our ticket out of poverty....but the Singapore Pools outlet near by you see the long queues on Wednesdays, Saturdays and Sundays. The masses buy their pieces of hope and show some optimism. Just get those 4 digits right and fortune comes your way. For the poor, it sounds like a viable plan at least there is hope....you can never build a fortune on a slave salary of $1000 ...at least the Singapore Pools outlet gives you some hope.

As I walk around my neighborhood, I always have to remember to look up once in a while in case there are people who want to end their misery prematurely - you don't want them to take you along with them when they fall on you. See those police tents popping up more and more often around my  area.

 

This is my neighbourhood. This is my home. This is the real Singapore. This is where my heart is and where I build my hope for the future. 

 







SAKAE shatters manpower myths, PAP is WRONG!

The myth that drove PAP govt to import more and more foreigners has been shattered by Sakae Sushi. At the end, in trying to hoodwink one ivory tower minister and a few PAP MPs, Sakae has unveiled what has driven PAP policy are wrongful myths fed to PAP govt that Singaporeans are fussy choosy workers who will turn down decent good paying jobs. The PAP govt instead of listening to the people they are suppose to represent believed everything that business bosses told them. The end result is the opening of floodgates for foreigners driving down the wages of poorer Singaporeans. 

What Sakae reveal is they basically want cheap labor doing 12 hour a day work 6 days a week. As long as Singaporeans hesitate to take such jobs, employers will scream FUSSY. These jobs can be redesigned, say into 2 shifts, so that older Singaporean workers can take it up. The govt wants Singaporeans to work until 65 or 70...then foul up the quality of jobs available by allowing the import of cheap 3rd world labor. In the end Singaporeans will be drag down by what these foreigners are willing to take because they are from undeveloped 3rd world countries with labor exploitation. How can the lives of Singaporeans improve if 3rd world labor is imported to compete side-by-side with them? It will drive them downwards....spiral them downwards.

Now Singapore's wage structure has become a 3rd world wage structure. Why a country develop until first world status but keeps a 3rd world wage structure? It means that progress only benefit a small number of people, prosperity is not shared by concentrated at the top and among the elites. This means our society has become very unequal in fact the most unequal country among developed nations.

Now this wage structure is weaved into our economy and become permanent and entrenched. Until now we still hear PAP persuading us to welcome more foreigners. Does the PAP not care about ordinary Singaporeans anymore who are suffering from the impact of their policy? 

The PAP tactic now is to call Singaporeans who are fearful of their bad policy XENOPHOBIC and ANTI-FOREIGNERS. Such political tactics will polarise our society and widen the divide. If they keep playing such tactics, how can we trust them to do what is right for Singaporeans and create a better future for all? We must move away from the politics of labeling and antagonism to craft a more constructive narrative...let the voice of reason and truth be heard. PAP should drop its negative tactics and listen to the ground truth.

National Conversation : Is for PAP to lecture us?

Once the so-called National Education starts, PAP MPs and ministers all jump onto the bandwagon. One started by calling those who are opposed to more foreigners xenophobic and negative. This theme was mooted by PM Lee himself during the National Day rally. PAP went on to paint Singaporeans in negative light - not big heart, small minded, ungenerous people. It is clear the PAP has a negative view of ordinary Singaporeans ..that is why the National Conversation start with the PAP lecturing us to be better people. 

Now Sim Ann wrote in her facebook:

Friend : Yeah, start with slaying the "cow-peh" and "cow-bu"

This is the latest of a list of insinuations by the PAP MPs that Singaporeans complaining people. This is very insulting. So that is how they will treat what Singaporeans say as complaints. When they are listening to us in a conversation - if we point out something is wrong, we cow-peh, cow-bu. 

The PAP (more accurately through SMRT) ran a transport system that broke down. On better days, they transport Singaporeans in crowded buses and trains like cattle. When you speak up about this, they say why you complain, why so negative...FT never complain, why you complain.

In a conversation, we are not going to talk about issues as equals. The PAP that brushed off our concerns will continue to brush off your concerns. Electricity tariffs too high? Got GST voucher and it is based on oil price...why you complain? They never think that electricity has more than double (or tripled?) but that person still make the same pay or lower since 10 years ago. 

This whole thing is NOT a CONVERSATION. It is the PAP getting the people to accept decisions they will make because they face strong opposition to what they do from the ground...and they start by arrogantly pointing what they view as negative traits in Singaporeans. So the PAP very good? 

Singaporeans suffered from very bad policies in the last 10 years, housing price shoot up, car prices shoot up, foreigners competing for our jobs, structural unemployment. Many PAP schemes as CPF which is for retirement does not ensure most people can retire. More people than before are falling into the poverty trap due to extremely low wages at the bottom 30%. Yet ministers and MPs sit up there collecting the highest pay in the world want to lecture us to be better people. 

Sometimes people of other countries call us "sheep" because we are so obedient to the govt. The PAP say Singaporeans like this and like that. ...but the truth is Singaporeans suffered under their bad policies - like building casinos that destroyed many families. When we try to converse with them, they now say we "cow-peh, cow-bu". Their arrogance is sickening. We give them power and they use the power like this.

That is why they say CONVERSATION. Immediately, people shut-up...they can go talk to their own supporters and right wingers who will sing praise about the PAP system. Singaporeans who oppose the govt policies know they have to elect opposition into parliament to be treated seriously. The minute you give absolute power to PAP, they treat you like sheep, you have no say.




There is no more respect for the Singaporean these days on issues that matter to them.